Protéger l’espace civique et la démocratie à l’ère du numérique 

Ce thème porte sur la protection des droits fondamentaux de la liberté d’expression, de réunion et de participation dans un monde de plus en plus numérique. Les plateformes en ligne devenant un élément central du discours public, il est essentiel de relever des défis tels que la surveillance numérique, la désinformation et la censure. Ce thème vise à promouvoir des politiques axées sur des espaces numériques ouverts, sécurisés et inclusifs, en veillant à ce que les Canadiens soient protégés en ligne. Ce thème souligne également la nécessité d’une réglementation transparente et de la protection de la vie privée pour maintenir une démocratie saine et fonctionnelle à l’ère numérique. 

Activités liées à ce thème :  

Programmes d’alphabétisation numérique 

Lutte contre la désinformation et la mésinformation 

Initiatives en faveur d’un Internet ouvert et de l’accès à l’information 

What did we commit to?: Transparency on International Commitments and Organizations

par  Bob

12 juillet 2025

0 votes positifs

0 votes négatifs

49  Vues

0  Rétroactions

Canada is a member of many many international organizations. Some are high profile and well known such as the UN or The G7, and some are lesser known focused on specific issues, and may get little to no media coverage. The Global Affairs website lists [https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/international_relations-relations_internationales/partnerships_organizations-partenariats_organisations.aspx?lang=eng]  more than 50 organizations in which Canada is a member, but the Government of Canada is a member of many more organizations that do not have big secretariats staffed with diplomats from GAC. Canadians should be able to see what organizations their government is participating in, since they are there to represent the interests of Canadians. 

As part of the upcoming Action Plan, Canada should establish a simple open database of international organizations the Federal Government is a member of. This should have some simple information such as:- Point of Contact- Who was the Authority to Join (such as a Minister, a DM, a DG of a Program etc.)- When Canada Joined- When Canada Left / When the Org closed- Website of the Org, etc.

This is a low cost, simple to implement way to ensure Canadians have transparency into what the government is doing on their behalf.

These international organizations Canada participates in often work to establish commitments:- on Principles the member countries agree on- on actions they commit to doing- or on funding members agree to provide an issue. 

Currently it is impossible to get a solid picture of all the commitments Canada has made to international partners. - This means there is no transparency to citizens on what their government has agreed to.- This means that there can be contradictory commitments being made. - This means with normal turnover of leadership at both the Political and Public Service level, knowledge of what Canada has committed to is lost over time. - This means extremely poor internal collaboration and coordination within the Federal Government, and with other levels of government in Canada.

Quote: "At the federal level, there are few formal mechanisms to ensure the government’s compliance with the international treaties that it has signed. Between 1915 and 1995, the Department of External Affairs was required by statute to report annually to Parliament with an account of Canada’s treaty-making activities, including a list of agreements concluded in that year. This practice ended when legislation was passed in 1995 to change the department’s name and mandate." [Canada’s Approach to the Treaty-Making Process (HillStudies). Publication No. 2008-45-E Library of Parliament,https://lop.parl.ca/staticfiles/PublicWebsite/Home/ResearchPublications/HillStudies/2008-45-e.pdf

In certain circumstances this is currently being done well, such as for the Sustainable Development Goals, but there are many less high profile commitments being made each year, and there should be similarly transparent resources available to citizens/taxpayers.

Currently when an international commitment is made, they are supposed to be sent to Global Affairs and kept by the Treaty Law Division at GAC, but they are not published anywhere or compiled into any public database.

Quote: "Canada uses non-legally binding instruments in international relations to express political and moral commitments as opposed to undertakings governed by public international law. They are nonetheless international instruments that should not be treated lightly." [Policy on Tabling of Treaties in Parliament: Appendix C, https://www.treaty-accord.gc.ca/procedures.aspx?lang=eng ]

In the next action plan, Canada should establish a simple open database of non-legally binding commitments made, something similar to the SDG commitment database but covering all commitments made by elected officials or public servants.   

Quebec has a database similar to what is described above, however it is a bit out of date. https://www.quebec.ca/gouvernement/ententes-engagements/international

Instead of a database of the entire agreements like Quebec has, these should be broken down and listed by individual clauses, such as was done on the PCO Mandate letter tracker or the Open Government National Action Plan Tracker. 

Inscrivez-vous / Connectez-vous pour ajouter votre amélioration

2 meilleures idées

ATI Disclosure for the mid-21st Century

 votes positifs

 votes négatifs

Reforming Access to Information Disclosure Practices When the Government of Canada's web publication standards were established in the early 2000s, they were built on the assumption that posting online content equalled the same as traditional publications with ISBN numbers. However, this approach did not adequately account for the unique characteristics of disclosures mandated by the Access to Information Act (ATIA). Historically, government disclosure processes relied on physical, paper-based methods—such as viewing documents in person, sending mail copies, or fax transmissions—methods inherently different from formal publications like novels or advertisements. Current Challenges and Costs During the 2024 calendar year, over 63,000 informal requests for previously released ATIA packages were made. Some packages received informal requests from as many as 80+ different parties requesting a copy of the disclosure. Presently, some of these disclosures are still delivered physically on USB drives packaged in bubble-wrapped envelopes and transported by courier services. This practice incurs substantial taxpayer costs. Transitioning to posting online would significantly reduce these expenses while simultaneously increasing public accessibility and efficiency. Integrity and Authenticity of Disclosures Citizens request previously released ATIA documents primarily because of their evidentiary significance. Altering or reformatting these documents, such as publishing them as website content, introduces unintended editorial changes that compromise the authenticity and integrity of the disclosures. It is crucial to maintain documents in their original form to preserve their value as trustworthy evidence. Advantages of Online Access Enabling immediate, direct online access to previously processed disclosure packages would yield numerous benefits. Although many of these documents are already accessible through third-party platforms, the government continues to employ outdated, costly, and inefficient physical delivery methods. These outdated practices delay public access and unnecessarily consume public sector resources, exacerbating existing backlogs in formal ATIA requests. Moreover, the current physical delivery process disproportionately disadvantages Francophone populations and individuals with accessibility needs. Citizens cannot preview or easily determine the relevance of the content, often resulting in weeks-long delays with uncertain outcomes. This inefficiency exemplifies bureaucratic waste, creates unnecessary electronic waste, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, and contradicts Canada's stated commitments to digital efficiency and environmental responsibility. Redirecting the funds currently spent on expensive courier fees towards translations and developing accessible digital formats—including utilizing AI-supported technologies—would far better serve diverse public needs. Policy and Regulatory Recommendations Prompt clarification of regulatory and policy frameworks is essential to clearly distinguish between disclosures and formal publications. Rapidly adopting an online disclosure system must explicitly communicate this distinction and reaffirm citizens' rights to request translations or alternative formats when necessary. Conclusion Implementing these recommended reforms would significantly enhance government transparency, operational efficiency, and equitable access to information. Aligning these practices with the principles established in both the Official Languages Act and the Access to Information Act highlights their quasi-constitutional importance, ensuring each act complements the other effectively. Ultimately, these improvements would reduce costs, minimize unnecessary delays, and foster greater civic participation—critical goals for strengthening democratic governance in the 21st century.We also need to remember Canada's obligation as a Open Data Charter signatory.------------- We will 1. Implement oversight and review processes to report regularly to the public on the progress and impact of our open data initiatives; 2. Ensure that information published as a result of transparency or anticorruption laws is released as open data; 3. Provide training programs, tools, and guidelines designed to ensure government employees are capable of using open data effectively in policy development processes; 4. Engage with the Freedom of Information / Access to Information / Right to Information community to align the proactive release of open data with governments’ obligation to release information on request;   5. Engage proactively with citizens and civil society and private sector representatives to determine what data they need to effectively hold governments accountable; 6. Respect citizens’ right to freedom of expression by protecting those who use open data to identify corruption or criticize governments;7. Encourage the use of open data to develop innovative, evidence-based policy solutions that benefit all members of society, as well as empower marginalized communities.

Afficher détail

Misinformation in healthcare + access to worldwide news

 votes positifs

 votes négatifs

In my opinion, I believe that it would be worth being aware of worldwide news and also having a web that addresses misinformation in healthcare

Afficher détail